New York, NY – Dec. 14, 2011 – The Electronic Retailing Self-Regulation Program (ERSP) has

recommended that Creative Product Solutions modify consumer testimonials in advertising

for the “Reduxx TrimSuit.” ERSP determined that the marketer could support certain

performance claims for the weighted exercise suit.

ERSP, the electronic direct-response industry’s self-regulatory forum, is administered by the

Council of Better Business Bureaus (CBBB) with policy oversight by the National Advertising

Review Council (NARC).

The marketer’s advertising came to the attention of ERSP pursuant to its ongoing

monitoring program.

ERSP reviewed broadcast and online advertising for Reduxx TrimSuit and identified several

claims for review, including:

• “Just wear it and lose weight!” and “You don’t have to change what you do – Just

change into the TrimSuit!”

• “The REDUXX TrimSuit will intensify all activities, causing your muscles to put in the

overtime and burn calories at a faster rate.”

• “Enhances athletic performance,” “Increased endurance,” and “Improves your overall


• “The Reduxx TrimSuit is proven to enhance your weight loss, athletic performance

and over all health and well being.”

• “I lost 7 pounds wearing the TrimSuit,” “I lost 22 pounds,” “I’ve lost 15-20 pounds,”

“135 pounds in the last year,” ”Lost those last 8 pounds,” ”I wore the TrimSuit and

lost 35 pounds,” and “From a 60″ waist to a 36″ waist.” [Infomercial testimonials]


Creative Product Solutions submitted a study conducted on the Pro Powersuit, a prototype

for the Reduxx TrimSuit. The results showed significant increases in calorie burn for those

wearing the Pro Powersuit as compared to those not wearing any weighted exercise suit.

ERSP found no significant differences between the prototype and the current product, the

Reduxx TrimSuit. The marketer also noted that weighted exercise suits are used by athletes

as increasing weight/resistance while training can help to improve endurance, strength, and

stamina. ERSP found the evidence submitted to be sufficient to support the performance

claims made in the advertising.

However, ERSP found that consumer testimonials featured quantified weight-loss claims

without a clear and conspicuous disclosure stating that the results promoted through the

testimonials required adherence to a strict diet and exercise regimen.

ERSP further recommended the disclosure indicate the results that consumers can typically

expect from use of the product in conjunction with diet and exercise.

The company, in its marketer’s statement, said that while “may not agree with all of ERSP’s

conclusions …  because we support your efforts to protect consumers we agree to accept

ERSP’s decision in its entirety and agree to modify our advertising as suggested.”


ERSP’s inquiry was conducted under ERSP Policies and Procedures for the Electronic Retailing Self-Regulation Program. Details of the initial inquiry, ERSP’s decision, and the advertiser’s response are available at the NARC Website,

About Advertising Industry Self-Regulation: The National Advertising Review Council (NARC) was formed in 1971. NARC establishes the policies and procedures for the National Advertising Division (NAD) of the Council of Better Business Bureaus, the CBBB’s Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU), the National Advertising Review Board (NARB) and the Electronic Retailing Self-Regulation Program (ERSP).

The NARC Board of Directors is composed of representatives of the 4A’s (American Association of Advertising Agencies, Inc.) the American Advertising Federation, Inc. (AAF), the Association of National Advertisers, Inc. (ANA), Council of Better Business Bureaus, Inc. (CBBB), Direct Marketing Association (DMA), Electronic Retailing Association (ERA) and Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB).  Its purpose is to foster truth and accuracy in national advertising through voluntary self-regulation.

NAD, CARU and ERSP are the investigative arms of the advertising industry’s voluntary self-regulation program. Their casework results from competitive challenges  from other advertisers, and also from self-monitoring traditional and new media. NARB, the appeals body, is a peer group from which ad-hoc panels are selected to adjudicate NAD/CARU cases that are not resolved at the NAD/CARU level. This unique, self-regulatory system is funded entirely by the business community; CARU is  financed by the children’s advertising industry, while NAD/NARC/NARB’s primary source of funding is derived from membership fees paid to the CBBB. ERSP’s funding is primarily derived from membership in the Electronic Retailing Association. For more information about advertising industry self-regulation, please visit